Place in therapy of key treatments for platinum-sensitive, relapsed, extensive-stage small cell lung cancer with a focus on lurbinectedin: a narrative review with case studies

Leonid Shunyakov, Firas B Badin, Judith Hafer, David König, Patrizia Froesch, Laurent Greillier

Abstract

Background: Virtually all patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC) develop resistance to firstline platinum-based chemoimmunotherapy and experience relapse. Second-line therapy is therefore an integral part of the treatment paradigm.

Methods: Evidence was reviewed for key second-line regimens recommended in major guidelines for treatment of patients with platinum-sensitive relapse (chemotherapy-free interval ≥90 days), focusing on recent prospective clinical trials and post hoc analyses. Case studies of second-line lurbinectedin are presented as examples of the current management approach to platinum-sensitive relapsed SCLC.

Results: Subject to the limitations of cross-trial comparisons, the evidence review allowed us to draw broad conclusions about the place in therapy of approved options for platinum-sensitive relapse. Platinum rechallenge is more effective and better tolerated than topotecan and is a reasonable second-line choice in suitable patients. Topotecan provides modest clinical benefit and has the potential to cause dose-limiting haematological toxicities. Cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-vincristine combination therapy offers no clear advantages over topotecan. Efficacy outcomes with second-line lurbinectedin are similar or better than those reported with platinum rechallenge, and lurbinectedin has a more favourable safety profile and simpler administration schedule. Second-line lurbinectedin preserves platinum rechallenge for later use and may resensitize tumour cells to platinum with potential survival advantages. Lurbinectedin safety is not affected by advanced age (≥65 years). Case studies highlight objective and durable responses to second-line lurbinectedin, along with good tolerability and quality of life.

Conclusions: Available evidence supports second-line lurbinectedin as a useful alternative to platinum rechallenge, topotecan and cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-vincristine in patients with platinum-sensitive relapsed SCLC.

Download the Plain Language Summary of this article: https://www.drugsincontext.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/dic.2025-7-9-PLS.pdf

Article Details

Article Type

Review

DOI

10.7573/dic.2025-7-9

Publication Dates

Accepted: ; Published: .

Citation

Shunyakov L, Badin FB, Hafer J, König D, Froesch P, Greillier L. Place in therapy of key treatments for platinum-sensitive, relapsed, extensive-stage small cell lung cancer with a focus on lurbinectedin: a narrative review with case studies. Drugs Context. 2025;14:2025-7-9. https://doi.org/10.7573/dic.2025-7-9

Article Views

Monthly article views (last 1 months)

Drugs in Context PubMed Central
Source HTML views PDF downloads Totals
Drugs in Context since November 11, 2025 193 122 315
PubMed Central 0 0 0
Totals 193 122 193
Register for alerts

I would like to be contacted by Drugs in Context when new articles are posted.

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.